DOJ Appeals 2-1 Ruling That Freed Georgetown Scholar Khan Suri

The Trump administration asked the US Supreme Court on Monday to overturn a lower-court order that freed Georgetown University scholar Badar Khan Suri from immigration detention, reopening a legal fight over whether federal judges can intervene in deportation-related cases tied to pro-Palestinian speech, according to Al Jazeera.

What is the Justice Department asking the Supreme Court to decide?

Solicitor General D. John Sauer petitioned the high court to determine whether federal immigration law barred a district court judge from ordering Khan Suri's release while his case moves forward, Al Jazeera reported. Sauer argued that letting the lower-court ruling stand would let detainees sidestep immigration courts entirely to fight their deportations, warning the effect on enforcement nationwide would be "all practically disastrous," according to Al Jazeera's account of his filing.

Why was Khan Suri detained in March 2025?

Khan Suri, an Indian citizen and postdoctoral fellow at Georgetown, was arrested by masked US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers outside his home in Rosslyn, Virginia, in March 2025, Al Jazeera reported. The arrest came amid a broader Trump administration campaign targeting foreign nationals and visa holders who engaged in pro-Palestinian activism on college campuses, according to the outlet. Critics at the time said Khan Suri was singled out over family ties rather than his own conduct: his wife is the daughter of Ahmed Yousef, a former adviser to assassinated Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh, Al Jazeera reported. He was transferred to a detention facility in Alvarado, Texas, before his release.

How did the courts rule on his release?

A district court judge ordered Khan Suri freed in May 2025, finding he was likely to succeed in proving his arrest was retaliation for constitutionally protected speech, according to Al Jazeera. In July, the Virginia-based US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld that release in a 2-1 decision, ruling that nothing barred a district judge from hearing a challenge to an allegedly unconstitutional detention even when it is tied to pending immigration-court proceedings, Al Jazeera reported. The dissent in that ruling was not detailed in the government's public filing as described by the outlet.

How does the case compare with Mahmoud Khalil's?

Sauer's petition points to a conflicting outcome in a separate case as grounds for Supreme Court review. The Third US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in January that district courts lack subject-matter jurisdiction to hear this type of immigration detention challenge, a decision that overturned a lower-court ruling freeing former Columbia University student and pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, according to Al Jazeera. Khalil had been released on bail in June last year after spending more than 100 days in ICE detention, the outlet reported. The split between the Third and Fourth Circuits — one finding jurisdiction, one finding none — is the specific legal conflict the Justice Department is asking the Supreme Court to resolve.

What are the competing arguments on due process and free speech?

The government's position, as laid out in Sauer's petition, is that immigration law channels detention and deportation disputes exclusively into the immigration court system, and that federal district judges overstep their authority by ordering releases mid-proceeding. Khan Suri's legal team has argued, and the district court agreed, that his detention likely violated his due process and First Amendment rights because it was retaliation for protected speech rather than any independent immigration violation, according to Al Jazeera. Al Jazeera's report does not include a direct quote from Khan Suri's attorneys responding to Monday's Supreme Court petition.

What happens next for Khan Suri and similar cases?

The Supreme Court has not indicated whether it will take up the government's petition. Khan Suri remains free while the appeal is pending, Al Jazeera reported. If the justices agree to hear the case, the ruling could set a nationwide standard for whether detained visa holders and students facing deportation over pro-Palestinian advocacy may seek relief in federal district courts or must rely solely on the immigration court system, which sits within the executive branch rather than the judiciary. The outcome would also bear directly on Khalil's case and others working through the circuit split identified in the government's filing.

mindfulAI Keyboard — An iPhone keyboard that rewrites a draft in a tone you pick. Four free AI actions a day.