Israeli Strike Hits Nasser Hospital, Killing Six in Gaza

Six people, including a doctor and patients, were killed in an Israeli strike on the Nasser medical complex in Gaza, according to the Financial Times. The strike landed despite a ceasefire that had been in place between Israel and Hamas, the report states.

The Nasser medical complex is one of the largest hospital facilities in Gaza and has repeatedly featured in reporting on the territory's health system during the conflict. The Financial Times does not provide additional detail in the material reviewed by HTT News on the specific building struck, the time of day, or the ordnance used.

What happened at the Nasser medical complex?

The Financial Times reports that the complex was hit in an attack that killed six people. Among the dead were a doctor and patients being treated at the facility, according to the outlet. No further description of the circumstances — including whether the strike targeted a specific structure within the complex or the broader grounds — appears in the source material available to HTT News.

The Nasser complex has long served as a primary referral hospital for southern Gaza, treating trauma cases from across the strip. Its repeated appearance in wartime reporting reflects its role as one of the few large-scale medical facilities still partially operating in the region.

How many people were killed, and who were they?

The death toll given by the Financial Times is six. The report specifies that the victims included a doctor along with patients who were inside the facility at the time. The Financial Times does not identify the doctor by name or specify the medical conditions of the patients killed, and no additional casualty breakdown — such as injuries or the total number of people inside the complex at the time — is included in the material reviewed.

HTT News has not independently verified the toll beyond what is reported by the Financial Times, and no secondary casualty figures were available in the source material to compare against.

Why does the strike raise questions about the ceasefire?

The originating headline frames the strike as occurring "despite" a ceasefire, indicating that a truce was understood to be in effect in Gaza at the time of the attack. The Financial Times report does not detail the specific terms of that ceasefire, when it took effect, or which parties had agreed to it. It also does not include a statement from the Israeli military addressing the strike or an explanation of what, if anything, prompted the attack on a medical facility during a period when hostilities were supposed to have paused.

Strikes on hospitals during active or recent ceasefires carry particular weight because medical facilities are generally treated as protected sites under the laws of armed conflict, unless they are being used for military purposes — a determination that often becomes contested in Gaza-related incidents. The source material reviewed for this report does not include any claim, from either side, about why the complex was struck.

What has been said about the strike?

The Financial Times report does not include a quoted statement from the Israeli military, the Israeli government, Hamas, or Gaza's health authorities regarding the strike on the Nasser complex. HTT News has not been provided with comment from either side in the material available, and no official explanation for the attack appears in the sourcing reviewed for this story.

The absence of an official account leaves open basic questions about the strike — including whether it was characterized by Israeli authorities as deliberate, mistaken, or in response to activity inside or near the complex. Those questions are not answered in the reporting available at this time.

What happens next at Nasser hospital?

The Financial Times report does not detail the medical complex's operational status following the strike, including whether functioning wards were damaged, whether patients were evacuated, or whether the facility continued treating the wounded afterward. Those operational details, along with any response from Israeli officials or international monitors, were not present in the source material reviewed for this report.

HTT News will continue to follow reporting from the Financial Times and other outlets on the strike, the status of the ceasefire referenced in the original report, and any statements issued by the parties involved. Readers can follow the original Financial Times report for further updates as the outlet continues its coverage.