tech
What We Know About Amazon's Decision to Drop Data Center NDAs

Amazon will stop using nondisclosure agreements when it negotiates with local governments over new data centers, the company said in a blog post, following a similar pledge Microsoft made earlier this year, according to TechCrunch. The move, buried inside a longer post arguing that data centers benefit communities, surfaced for discussion on TechCrunch's Equity podcast, where staff writers Anthony Ha, Sean O'Kane and Rebecca Bellan weighed whether dropping the secrecy will change how local opponents view the projects.
What did Amazon actually announce?
Amazon said it will no longer require NDAs as a condition of talks with municipalities and other local government bodies over proposed data centers, TechCrunch reported. The announcement came inside a broader post making the case that data centers are good for the communities that host them, not as a standalone policy rollout. "It's an interesting thing that it was sort of buried in the blog post and part of a larger story that Amazon's clearly trying to tell," O'Kane said on the podcast, per TechCrunch. Amazon's move follows Microsoft, which made a comparable commitment earlier.
Why is the industry moving away from NDAs now?
The backdrop is a wave of local moratoriums and zoning fights over data center construction, driven by resident concerns about property values, electricity bills and water usage tied to the facilities. O'Kane argued that secrecy in the negotiating process is central to the conflict, telling his co-hosts, per TechCrunch: "I think so much of that just really goes back to the fact that a lot of these projects are being negotiated essentially in secret. Sometimes they're being negotiated [with the public knowing] that it's a data center, but just not knowing who's actually going to use it or occupy it at any point."
"We've seen, through a lot of the controversy and backlash to AI and data centers, that the industry just does a really poor job explaining itself, and that they are obviously and constantly frustrated with the fact that most people can't envision a world in which this stuff is useful for them." — Sean O'Kane, TechCrunch's Equity podcast
What's an NDA in this context, and why does it matter?
In data center siting deals, an NDA has typically barred local officials or residents from learning which company — Amazon, Microsoft, Meta or another operator — will actually occupy a facility, even after a project is publicly known to be a data center. TechCrunch's panel noted this mirrors earlier fights over corporate secrecy in local negotiations; O'Kane pointed to Uber's tax-subsidy talks with a city outside Orlando in the mid-2010s, negotiated under similar confidentiality, as a long-standing template for how tech companies have approached local governments.
Will ending NDAs actually calm opposition to new data centers?
The Equity hosts disagreed on how much the policy shift will matter. Bellan was skeptical that the current round of moratoriums will have lasting effect, noting on the podcast, per TechCrunch, that such bans typically run only a year or two while "these data centers aren't coming online for the next two, three, four, five years" — meaning the timing mismatch could blunt any political pressure. Ha countered that data center backers clearly see the backlash as a real threat, given that both Amazon and Microsoft have now volunteered to abandon a negotiating tool that worked in their favor. Transparency about which company sits in a facility removes one layer of secrecy, but it does not by itself resolve underlying disputes over power demand, water draw or local tax terms that moratorium supporters cite.
What's driving the broader backlash against data centers?
According to the TechCrunch discussion, the dispute sits inside a wider pattern: the AI industry's communication with the public about data centers, electricity costs and water use has lagged the pace of construction and investment. O'Kane framed the NDA issue as symptomatic of a larger problem — that companies building AI infrastructure have struggled to make residents see a direct benefit, leaving local approval fights to run on process complaints as much as substantive ones. Whether Amazon's and Microsoft's NDA reversals shift that dynamic, or simply remove one point of friction while leaving the core disputes over power and water intact, is the question the Equity panel left open as data center moratoriums continue to spread across local jurisdictions.
For the full conversation, including additional detail on Amazon's blog post and the panel's exchange, see the original Equity podcast discussion on TechCrunch.
Questions
Did Amazon stop using NDAs for data center deals?
Amazon said it will no longer require nondisclosure agreements when negotiating with local governments over new data centers, following a similar move by Microsoft earlier this year, according to TechCrunch.
Why do NDAs matter in data center negotiations?
NDAs have often kept local officials and residents from learning which company will occupy a proposed data center even after the project becomes public, fueling distrust in local approval fights, per TechCrunch's Equity podcast.